> REPORT > WE.R.IN
No KIds Zone; Include or Exclude, that is the Question
Kim Rey Yeeun  |  smt_dklj@sm.ac.kr
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
승인 2015.10.10  16:55:14
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 네이버 구글 msn

 

   
www.google.com  

 

                           
www.google.com  


Every day people see various signs that ban things.  ‘No Pets Allowed’ and ‘No Bicycles Allowed’ are a couple of common ones that you might see at a subways station or at a restaurant.  However, the ‘No Kids Zone’ sign is starting to appear more and more frequently.  A ‘No Kids Zone’ is an area that prohibits children or infants under a certain age.  Currently, there is a strong argument on whether this ban of children protects the store owner or whether it is unfair discrimination against children.  Despite the controversy, more and more store owners are posting ‘No Kids Zone’ signs.  The Sookmyung Times asked Sookmyungians about this recent phenomenon. 
 

   
www.google.com  


                                                          - Debate Topic -
                         Should the ‘No Kids Zone’ ban continue or be stopped?
 

 

 

 


 

 


PRO
Yu Hwakyung

Department of Food & Nutrition '15
dbghkrud@naver.com

 

Recently, many stores have adopted the ‘No Kids Zone’ policy.  Stores are banning customers accompanied by infants or children under a certain age.  Children often bother other customers or damage facilities at stores, which has led to the increase in the ‘No Kids Zone.’  By following this new policy of ‘No kids,’ many businesses and store owners are lessening their financial damage.
However, I disagree with this ‘No Kids Zone’ policy.  First of all, children and infants are unaware of their actions.  Children usually act without awareness of the consequences of their actions, so they cannot be held responsible for their behavior.  Problems caused at businesses such as children talking too loudly or running around is the sole responsibility of the parents.  They need to change their child’s behavior.  If a parent changes a nappy without considering where (s)he is, then it’s the parent’s mistake.  They need to be held accountable for their ill-manners in public places.  The government needs to start campaigns to raise awareness or arrange a ‘Kids Zone’ so that the children are able to run free. 
Second, there are many other groups of people that cause trouble at businesses and shops.  For instance, at some restaurants, middle and high school students often bother other customers with their noise.  Also, some adults lack manners in public and bother other customers.  Therefore, the ‘No Kids Zone,’ only bans children due to age; it’s discriminatory action.
Lastly, the ‘No Kids Zone’ limits parent’s range of action.  Recently, parents are often heard saying that people stare at them every time their child cries, and though they are trying to hand the situation, people are judging them harshly.  For these three reasons, the ‘No Kids Zone’ should not continue nor increase.  The ‘No Kids Zone’ ban will not solve society’s problems caused by young ones because the true solution lies in raising awareness among the general public.  Parents without common sense need basic etiquette courses.  There should be more ‘Kids Zone’ areas as well to solve the problem.

 

   
 

 

 

 

CON
Oh Eunkyung

Department of Library & Information Science '14
onmds5@gmail.com



Just recently, ‘No Kids Zone’ signs, especially for kids under the age of 8, have been showing up at the front entrances of restaurants, cafés and so on.  Currently, in Korea, there are no clear regulations concerning these areas, so the spread of these signs are being debated everywhere.  However, I believe the ‘No Kids Zone’ areas should exist and the benefits are reaped by store owners, customers, and parents.
First, from the perspective of a store owner, the ‘No Kids Zone’ sign is a way to prevent latent loss.  For example, certain restaurants are dangerous for children, because they could get injured easily.  In places like these, if a child bumps into a waiter serving food and gets hurt, who should be held responsible for the injury?  The child running into the waiter?  The parents because they didn’t keep a watchful eye?  Unlike common sense, the court ruled in favor of the child, pointing a finger at the owner who would be expected to take responsibility for the negligence; this gives storeowners additional pressure besides management.
Next, use of ‘No Kids Zone’ areas guarantee customer rights—to not have to be disturbed and to feel satisfied when leaving the business.  It is easy to find parents that lack common sense and etiquette like changing their infant’s nappy out in the open or having them pee in a cup openly in a restaurant.  Obviously, other customers will feel uncomfortable in this type of atmosphere.  According to a survey by a Albamon 66% of people agreed on kid-free zones, which shows that this idea will serves to increase customer satisfaction. 
Lastly, from a parent’s perspective, the ‘No Kids Zone’ areas help ensure their child’s education and safety.  Also, the ‘No Kids Zone’ areas would educate children on how carelessly running around disturbs other people.  ‘No Kids Zone’ areas do not mean no kids are allowed.  Businesses are only trying to restrict parents who act without common sense.  Considering the cause that has led to the ‘No Kids Zone’ areas, blindly criticizing this policy is wrong, since ‘No Kids Zone’ areas came out of necessity.

Kim Rey Yeeun의 다른기사 보기  
폰트키우기 폰트줄이기 프린트하기 메일보내기 신고하기
트위터 페이스북 미투데이 네이버 구글 msn 뒤로가기 위로가기
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
자동등록방지용 코드를 입력하세요!   
확인
- 200자까지 쓰실 수 있습니다. (현재 0 byte / 최대 400byte)
- 욕설등 인신공격성 글은 삭제 합니다. [운영원칙]
이 기사에 대한 댓글 이야기 (0)
최근인기기사
1
Presidential Election in Sync with the Cherry Blossomes
2
President Park's Dismissal
3
China's Serious Retaliation due to THAAD Arrangement
4
Moonlight, Shining Meaningfully and Beautifully
5
New Boys Generation, Produce 101 Season 2
6
What We Live By
7
Absence of Representatives in Universities
8
Cheaper, Unhealthier, in Poorer Taste
9
A Day at Yongmun Traditional Market
10
How to Write Articles Well
숙명타임즈 소개기사제보광고문의불편신고개인정보취급방침이메일무단수집거부청소년보호정책
The Sookmyung Times is published monthly by the Sookmyung Times Office at the Student Building Room 308,
Student Union Building Room 308, 100, Cheongpa-ro 47-gil, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea, 140-742. *Registration No. Ra-1783, Oct. 25, 1973
Tel : 02)710-9151,9722   |  Fax : 02)706-2695   |  청소년보호책임자 : 김주희   |   Copyright © 2007 숙명타임즈. All rights reserved.